Permalink for Comment #1311257168 by Dundun

, comment by Dundun
Dundun @York_Durden said:
This poorly written exercise in scatology and juvenile humor isn't fit to carry Mr. Miner's shaving kit. Who thought this review worthy of publication? When I read a Phish review, I want the note-by-note approach. I don't care where somebody stayed or how often they showered or how much liquor and cigarettes they consumed. Waste of bits.
It wasn't a review, it was an essay with SB9 as a subject.

Mr. Miner is probably the most well known phish reviewer today, which I assume is why he was specifically mentioned.

BTW-- I thought the bits about the long list of variables is pretty spot on. I'd like to add a couple to the vector -- hydration level (can't dance if you need a drink), bladder % fullness (I'm about to piss my pants but I can't leave this jam), and the number of people in a 10 foot radius who talk through the jams.


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode