Permalink for Comment #1379909132 by mgolia6

, comment by mgolia6
mgolia6 @andrewrose said:
@mgolia6 said:

Lastly, I know the commitment to volunteering to review a show and appreciate that you offered your services (I thought the writing style, commentary, and analysis was a mild strength) but don’t commit to a recap if you aren’t willing to put in the extra time to finish the review. You basically stopped describing what you heard in 3rd quarter of the show. Not trying to be harsh but complete the assignment versus just telling us to go listen!? Especially for a solid show such as this one.
Tough crowd. I must inquire, Mgolia … are you sure I’m the one who missed the assignment here?
I am just providing my perspective, it’s certainly not the only one, clearly not yours, and presumably not the end all. I am totally cool with that. Also, certainly didn’t think you missed the assignment, just felt you came into the back part of the review with a full head of steam and, as a reader, I wanted more. Hope that makes sense.


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode